Tuesday, July 21, 2015

The Western Coast— To road or not to road?

Say No to the Coastal Road! - At the Public Meeting
      The 19th of July, Sunday, just when the sun was setting over the low tide. A table, seating 5, put up on the dais of the Carter Road Amphitheatre, with neat rows of around thirty-odd chairs arranged facing it. Standing all the way at the back, one could see rows of salt-n-pepper heads, all listening intently to the five people on stage. The breeze was coming in from sea, passing through the shallow mangroves. The abundant Sunday crowd, gathering along the walkway, trying to grab a sentence or two of what the experts on stage were trying to say, would disperse just as fast as they came.“This road isn't just going to affect the environment, it is going to affect you all! The fresh air that brings you here every evening for your walks? Soon, it will be poisonous air from the road!” declared Darryl D’Monte, ex-Editor of The Times of India. D’Monte, and a bunch of other like-minded individuals, were gathering to protest the Maharashtra Government’s Coastal Road plan. In an elaborate meeting that lasted for a little less than two hours, D’Monte and his panellists went through how the coastal road, one of the city’s most ambitious projects, would alter their daily lives, why they should care and how not many people did, and what they can do to help. Nearly every resident in the audience stood up to ask questions and express their concern. One resident even urged the by-standers to make a move and sign their petition form. The movement needed them, and they needed Carter road. Although her monologue did urge a few to go ahead and show their support for the movement, most just went along minded their own business.  The meeting concluded with an appeal from the organisers to please support the cause in any way they could, and that more such meeting will be conducted across the coastal suburbs. All-in-all, the meeting was deemed a success.So, what was a man of Darryl D’Monte’s stature doing spearheading a Bandra Residents Association meet? Not that nothing phenomenal has come out of Bandra Residents Association meets (in the past, the association has managed to revoke the BMC’s order to label one of its Koliwadas a slum), but why is he fighting the coastal road project? And why is he getting so detailed? Do we know? Should we? Here’s why.

The Coastal Road Project


      The Maharashtra Government has received clearance to build a coastal road, running from Nariman Point in the south to Kandivali in the North. The road is to be approximately 35kms long, and allow vehicles to travel at up to 90 kmph. The project is said to cost about ₹8,500 crore, inclusive of the cost required for land reclamation. In a tweet about the project, Devendra Fadnavis said “Coastal road will decongest traffic in Mumbai
and create 91 hectares of green space.”

      In a report by the Joint Technical Committee (Govt. of Maharashtra) from December 2011, apart from saving time, the coastal road will also cut down on transport related pollution. This would be a boost for the infrastructure of the city, and be a boon to many!Why would anyone ever wish for this project to not take off?

Why not? Here’s why.

      According to a flyer handed out at the protest, there are multiple reasons why we wouldn't want this, as a community.
  • The sea, which brings fresh air, will now bring toxic fumes from the coastal road.
  • Coastlines, beaches, gaothans and koliwadas will be destroyed forever.
  • Mangroves, that protect Mumbai from flooding, and produce twice as much oxygen as most trees, will be wiped out in stretches.
  • It will have a damaging effect on the livelihood of coastal communities, which includes 50,000 fishermen.
  • It will cut off historical monuments, and result in the loss of diversity of waterfronts and public spaces.
  • The current cost of the coastal road is ₹12,000 crores [sic]. Experts have shown that in less than half the cost, traffic can be eased out by implementing a comprehensive transportation policy. 45% of Mumbai travels by train, 22% by bus, 16% by two wheelers, and 7% use cars. Focus should be shifted on improving modes of transportation for 93% Mumbaikars.
      Not to be the old lady from around the block who cribs about everything, this protest meeting involved a dialogue of what the residents thought could be solutions and alternatives to this problem that they were faced with. Several suggested that water transport be explored, while others spoke about enhancing the existing public transport. One idea that stood out of the lot, was to verticalise the railway lines; to build a corridor just above the existing railway lines, and utilise the pre-existing route in a creative manner.

So, where do we go from here?

      What do we think? How much of what either part is saying makes sense to us? What we do know, is where Mr. Darryl D’Monte is taking this fight. In conversation, Mr.D’Monte happened to mention that he wants to be able to speak to as many people about the cause as possible. He said, that although the movement was getting maximum support from the English media, Marathi media seemed to be driving in the absolute opposite direction. He did, although, seem positive that the scene would change, and soon.





Opinion: Personally, I believe that the project isn’t well prioritised. It is false that this will be the fastest way to get from the south to the north. Trains are just as fast. The only thing trains lack is the luxury factor, and the prioritising of the rich, urban class seems to be prioritised in our policy making, more often than not. The only valid argument that the pro’s of the project hold, is the reduction of transport related pollution, thus effectively cutting down several respiratory problems in the city. But is the traffic the only source of pollution for us? We all know the answer to that. *cough* Wadala *cough* Darukhana *cough cough*. So as an undergraduate student, if I can say that cutting down the mangroves, the lungs of our city, in order to reduce air pollution, some really messed up logic is at play here.
      Besides, I haven't even started talking about the number of people who will be forced to beg on the streets, thanks to the destruction of their livelihood. It’s a shame that the people in question are such culturally rich people too!
      Where do we go from here?
      That’s a really tough question to answer! 

No comments:

Post a Comment